From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McLeod v. Drivers & Chauffeurs Local Union No. 816, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of America

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Apr 26, 1960
277 F.2d 800 (2d Cir. 1960)

Opinion

No. 276, Docket 25981.

Argued April 6, 1960.

Decided April 26, 1960.

Winthrop A. Johns, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C. (Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, and James M. Fitzpatrick, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on the brief), for appellee.

Herbert A. Levy, New York City (Cohen Weiss and Jack Last, New York City, on the brief), for appellant.

Before CLARK, HINCKS, and FRIENDLY, Circuit Judges.


We think Judge Ryan was correct in concluding that the plaintiff Regional Director of the Second Region of the National Labor Relations Board had reasonable cause to believe that the defendant had committed an unfair labor practice. Accordingly the issuance of the injunction pending the Board hearing was proper under the National Labor Relations Act § 10( l), 29 U.S.C. § 160( l).

Affirmed.


Summaries of

McLeod v. Drivers & Chauffeurs Local Union No. 816, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of America

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Apr 26, 1960
277 F.2d 800 (2d Cir. 1960)
Case details for

McLeod v. Drivers & Chauffeurs Local Union No. 816, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of America

Case Details

Full title:Ivan C. McLEOD, Regional Director of the Second Region of the National…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit

Date published: Apr 26, 1960

Citations

277 F.2d 800 (2d Cir. 1960)

Citing Cases

McLeod for and on Behalf of N. L. R. B. v. Bakery, Pastry and Frozen Baked Products Drivers and Helpers, Local 802, Intern. Broth. of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America

Respondent has not made any demonstrated progress in its organizational effort and has resorted to none of…

Drivers Chauffeurs L. Un. 816 v. N.L.R.B

This contention was rejected by the Trial Examiner whose findings were accepted in toto by the Board. Pending…