From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McLarty v. Emhart Corporation

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Oct 23, 1970
178 S.E.2d 344 (Ga. Ct. App. 1970)

Opinion

45576.

ARGUED SEPTEMBER 11, 1970.

DECIDED OCTOBER 23, 1970.

Discovery. Richmond Superior Court. Before Judge Harrison from Eastern Circuit.

Isaac S. Jolles, for appellant.

Aynes, Feldman Genins, R. John Genins, for appellee.


Discovery for the purpose of aiding the judgment and execution under Code § 38-1201 can be used only after final judgment is obtained and no appeal therefrom is pending. Bradley v. Coach Six Restaurants, 112 Ga. App. 278 (1a) ( 145 S.E.2d 55). Section 69 of the Civil Practice Act (Ga. L. 1966, pp. 609, 667, as amended; Code Ann. § 81A-169) does not require a different conclusion as the purpose of that section is the same, that is, to aid the enforcement of a judgment or execution after it has become a final determination of the issue between the parties. The trial court therefore erred in overruling the defendant's objections to interrogatories propounded for such purposes while motion for new trial with supersedeas granted was pending.

Judgment reversed. Jordan, P. J., and Eberhardt, J., concur.

ARGUED SEPTEMBER 11, 1970 — DECIDED OCTOBER 23, 1970.


Summaries of

McLarty v. Emhart Corporation

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Oct 23, 1970
178 S.E.2d 344 (Ga. Ct. App. 1970)
Case details for

McLarty v. Emhart Corporation

Case Details

Full title:McLARTY v. EMHART CORPORATION

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Oct 23, 1970

Citations

178 S.E.2d 344 (Ga. Ct. App. 1970)
122 Ga. App. 677

Citing Cases

Clinton Leasing Corporation v. Patterson

(Emphasis supplied.) McLarty v. Emhart Corp., 122 Ga. App. 677 ( 178 S.E.2d 344) (1970). OCGA § 9-11-69…