From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McKinney v. Dade County

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Feb 18, 1977
341 So. 2d 1061 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1977)

Opinion

No. 76-665.

February 1, 1977. Rehearing Denied February 18, 1977.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Dade County, Harold Vann, J.

Brumer, Moss, Cohen Rodgers and Burt E. Redlus, Miami, for appellant.

Fowler, White, Burnett, Hurley, Banick Knight and Fred R. Ober, Miami, for appellees.

Before BARKDULL, HAVERFIELD and NATHAN, JJ.


Plaintiff, Charles McKinney, appeals an adverse partial final summary judgment on the issue of liability with respect to his claim of malicious prosecution.

On September 5 and again on October 8, 1974 McKinney was arrested by defendant Sgt. Ruth Cox. Two sets of criminal charges were filed against him and on October 31, 1974 and April 30, 1975 the charges were dismissed for lack of prosecution. McKinney filed a suit for false arrest and malicious prosecution against Sgt. Cox, her employer, Dade County, and its liability insurer, Appalachian Insurance Company of Providence. Following pretrial discovery, defendants moved for summary judgment on the issue of liability as to McKinney's claim of malicious prosecution. After hearing argument of counsel, the trial judge entered partial summary judgment for the defendants. McKinney appeals.

McKinney was taken into custody on October 8, 1974 pursuant to a capias and information filed by the state attorney for possession and sale of heroin. When a prosecuting attorney files an information against a defendant, he conclusively determines that the evidence is adequate to establish probable cause to put the defendant on trial. See State ex rel. Hardy v. Blount, 261 So.2d 172 (Fla. 1972) and cases cited therein. We, therefore, conclude the trial judge was eminently correct in entering summary judgment on the issue of liability on McKinney's claim of malicious prosecution with respect to the October 8 arrest.

Appellees candidly admit that the record does not support the entry of summary final judgment with regards to the prosecution resulting from the September 5, 1974 arrest and we reverse that portion of the summary judgment on McKinney's malicious prosecution claim arising out of the September 5 arrest.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part.


Summaries of

McKinney v. Dade County

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Feb 18, 1977
341 So. 2d 1061 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1977)
Case details for

McKinney v. Dade County

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES McKINNEY, APPELLANT, v. DADE COUNTY, A POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Feb 18, 1977

Citations

341 So. 2d 1061 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1977)

Citing Cases

Thorpe v. Cook

"1) That it affirmatively appears from the records that there is no genuine issue of material fact with…

Southern Bell Tel. and Tel. v. Roper

The plaintiff Roper thereupon brought suit in the court below in November 1976 against the defendant Southern…