From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McKinney v. City of Sacramento

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Apr 5, 2022
2:20-CV-00393 TLN (E.D. Cal. Apr. 5, 2022)

Opinion

2:20-CV-00393 TLN

04-05-2022

MALCOLM MCKINNEY Plaintiff, v. CITY OF SACRAMENTO, CHAD LEWIS AND PAMELA MASSE, Defendants.

JOHN T. BELL, SBN


JOHN T. BELL, SBN

ORDER STAYING CIVIL ACTION

TROY L. NUNLEY, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Plaintiff Malcolm McKinney and Defendant City of Sacramento have made a stipulated request to stay this matter pending conclusion of a related stated criminal action arising out of the same facts as this civil action.

Goo cause appearing therefor, the request to stay this action is GRANTED. The parties will report to the Court concerning the status of the state criminal case every 120 days, with the first report due 120 days after the entry of this Order. If the related criminal action is completed before any report is due, the parties will lodge a stipulation to vacate the stay within 30 days of the completion of the criminal case. ,


Summaries of

McKinney v. City of Sacramento

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Apr 5, 2022
2:20-CV-00393 TLN (E.D. Cal. Apr. 5, 2022)
Case details for

McKinney v. City of Sacramento

Case Details

Full title:MALCOLM MCKINNEY Plaintiff, v. CITY OF SACRAMENTO, CHAD LEWIS AND PAMELA…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Apr 5, 2022

Citations

2:20-CV-00393 TLN (E.D. Cal. Apr. 5, 2022)