From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McKim v. Frobar Investment Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 23, 1994
204 A.D.2d 609 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

May 23, 1994

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Fredman, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with one bill of costs to the respondents.

On appeal, the plaintiff contends that the court's charge to the jury was erroneous and denied her a fair trial. However, none of the alleged errors are preserved for appellate review. In any event, the charge as a whole properly instructed the jury on the applicable principles of law (see, Fleischer v. Melmarkets, Inc., 174 A.D.2d 647, 648; Timmons v. Hecker, 110 A.D.2d 762) and, thus, provides no basis for a reversal of the verdict. Sullivan, J.P., Rosenblatt, Pizzuto and Altman, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

McKim v. Frobar Investment Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 23, 1994
204 A.D.2d 609 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

McKim v. Frobar Investment Company

Case Details

Full title:ISABELLE E. McKIM, Appellant, v. FROBAR INVESTMENT COMPANY, Defendant and…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 23, 1994

Citations

204 A.D.2d 609 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
614 N.Y.S.2d 224