From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McKibben v. Hopper

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Feb 6, 1978
565 F.2d 1316 (5th Cir. 1978)

Opinion

No. 77-1834. Summary Calendar.

Rule 18, 5 Cir.; see Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. of New York et al., 5 Cir., 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I.

January 10, 1978. Rehearing Denied February 6, 1978.

Robert J. Littlefield (court appointed), Decatur, Ga., for petitioner-appellant.

Arthur K. Bolton, Atty. Gen., B. Dean Grindle, Jr., John C. Walden, Asst. Attys. Gen., Atlanta, Ga., for respondent-appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia.

Before COLEMAN, GODBOLD, and TJOFLAT, Circuit Judges.



Since the district court has not ruled on the appellant's motion for a certificate of probable cause, this appeal was improvidently docketed. Lacking such certificate, this Court is without jurisdiction to consider the appeal. Rule 22(b), Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure; 28 U.S.C. § 2253; Welch v. Texas Board of Parole and Pardon, 5 Cir. 1972, 460 F.2d 298; Hines v. Pitcher, 5 Cir. 1971, 440 F.2d 792. This Court may not make the initial determination of whether a certificate of probable cause should be granted. Lee v. Washington Parish, 5 Cir. 1973, 476 F.2d 285; Stewart v. Beto, 5 Cir. 1971, 451 F.2d 185. Therefore, the appeal is dismissed without prejudice and the cause remanded to allow the district court to rule upon appellant's motion for a certificate of probable cause.

DISMISSED and REMANDED.


Summaries of

McKibben v. Hopper

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Feb 6, 1978
565 F.2d 1316 (5th Cir. 1978)
Case details for

McKibben v. Hopper

Case Details

Full title:EDDIE R. McKIBBEN, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, v. JOE S. HOPPER, WARDEN, GEORGIA…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit

Date published: Feb 6, 1978

Citations

565 F.2d 1316 (5th Cir. 1978)

Citing Cases

Hill v. Johnson

Instead of making Hill begin anew and refile his briefs, we will construe his notice of appeal and request…

Fabian v. Reed

While Fabian has filed a timely notice of appeal in compliance with Fed.R.App.P. 4(a), he has never filed a…