From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McKeown v. Kelly

Supreme Court of Florida
Oct 5, 1934
156 So. 713 (Fla. 1934)

Opinion

Opinion Filed October 5, 1934.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Calhoun County, Amos Lewis, Judge.

Marion B. Knight, John H. Carter, and John H. Carter, Jr., for Appellants;

H. V. McClelland and Thos. C. Ray, for Appellees.


It appears that Thomas McKeown died leaving a widow and several children, also one grandchild who is the daughter of a deceased son. Apparently the widow is the mother of all the children of the decedent. Some time after the death of Thomas McKeown a kill was probated as his last will and testament, one of the testator's sons being named and qualified as executor. Later the bill of complaint herein to annul the will and for an accounting and partition of the property was filed against the son who had been appointed executor under the will, the widow and the testator's heirs being complainants. Apparently the testator's property here involved included his homestead real estate. The court decreed as prayed, and the defendant appealed. The appeal taken to this Court from the final decree is but a step in the cause. At the bar of the court here it was stated by counsel for all parties that since the appeal herein was taken, the decedent's widow, one of the complainants, has died.

The decree provided for awarding the widow a dower interest in the decedent's property, which under the law in force at the death of Thomas McKeown in 1927 was a life interest in one-third of the land and a portion of the personalty.

In the decree the partition was to be made subject to the widow's dower interest. As the widow is no longer living, and no will of hers being involved, the entire estate may now be subject to be partitioned among the heirs of Thomas McKeown and his widow, who apparently are the same persons with equal rights in the property.

To that end the decree is reversed and the cause remanded for appropriate proceedings as the parties may be advised as to their rights for partition and an accounting.

Reversed for appropriate proceedings.

DAVIS, C. J., and WHITFIELD, TERRELL, BROWN and BUFORD, J. J., concur.


Summaries of

McKeown v. Kelly

Supreme Court of Florida
Oct 5, 1934
156 So. 713 (Fla. 1934)
Case details for

McKeown v. Kelly

Case Details

Full title:T. J. McKEOWN v. E. M. KELLY, et al

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Oct 5, 1934

Citations

156 So. 713 (Fla. 1934)
156 So. 713

Citing Cases

Welsh v. Barnes-Duluth Shipbuilding Co.

the judgment, see Wendelsdorf v. County of Martin, 220 Minn. 614, 20 N.W.2d 528. Of the errors assigned…

Weed v. Knox

However, in that case it was held that a widow who has a dower interest in real estate of her deceased…