From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McKenzie v. Pacific Bell Telephone Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Dec 1, 2015
No. 2:15-cv-2325 TLN CKD (E.D. Cal. Dec. 1, 2015)

Opinion

No. 2:15-cv-2325 TLN CKD

12-01-2015

KIM McKENZIE, Plaintiff, v. PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis was referred to the undersigned by minute order dated November 10, 2015. Plaintiff has not paid the fee ordinarily required to file an action in this court, and filed an incomplete application to proceed without prepayment of fees. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914(a), 1915(a). Plaintiff has now submitted a completed application.

Plaintiff states that her bi-weekly take home pay is $2,500, that her rent is $1500 and that she pays utilities of about $400 and other expenses in the amount of $300.

Pursuant to federal statute, a filing fee of $350.00 is required to commence a civil action in federal district court. 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a). In addition, a $50.00 general administrative fee for civil cases must be paid. 28 U.S.C. § 1914(b). The court may authorize the commencement of an action "without prepayment of fees and costs or security therefor, by a person who makes affidavit that he is unable to pay such costs or give security therefor." 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). The amount of plaintiff's income shows that plaintiff is able to pay the filing fee and costs. Thus, plaintiff has made an inadequate showing of indigency. See Alexander v. Carson Adult High Sch., 9 F.3d 1448 (9th Cir. 1993); California Men's Colony v. Rowland, 939 F.2d 854, 858 (9th Cir. 1991); Stehouwer v. Hennessey, 841 F. Supp. 316, (N.D. Cal. 1994).

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff is granted fourteen days in which to submit the appropriate fees to the Clerk of the Court. Plaintiff is cautioned that failure to pay the filing and general administrative fees in the amount of $400 will result in a recommendation that the application to proceed in forma pauperis be denied and the instant action be dismissed without prejudice. Dated: December 1, 2015

/s/_________

CAROLYN K. DELANEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 4 mckenz2325.ifp.den


Summaries of

McKenzie v. Pacific Bell Telephone Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Dec 1, 2015
No. 2:15-cv-2325 TLN CKD (E.D. Cal. Dec. 1, 2015)
Case details for

McKenzie v. Pacific Bell Telephone Co.

Case Details

Full title:KIM McKENZIE, Plaintiff, v. PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY, et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Dec 1, 2015

Citations

No. 2:15-cv-2325 TLN CKD (E.D. Cal. Dec. 1, 2015)