From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McKenzie v. Ostreich

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 9, 2002
300 A.D.2d 371 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)

Opinion

2002-01643

Submitted November 13, 2002.

December 9, 2002.

In an action to recover damages for medical malpractice, etc., the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Carter, J.), dated January 11, 2002, which denied his motion for leave to amend his answer to include an affirmative defense of the statute of limitations.

Mulholland, Minion Roe, Williston Park, N.Y. (Brian R. Davey of counsel), for appellant.

Before: MYRIAM J. ALTMAN, J.P., SONDRA MILLER, LEO F. McGINITY, ROBERT W. SCHMIDT, REINALDO E. RIVERA, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is reversed, with costs, and the motion is granted.

Leave to amend a pleading should be freely granted absent a showing of prejudice resulting from the delay and provided that the proposed amendment is not plainly lacking in merit. Here, the Supreme Court improvidently exercised its discretion in denying the defendant's motion.

ALTMAN, J.P., S. MILLER, McGINITY, SCHMIDT and RIVERA, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

McKenzie v. Ostreich

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 9, 2002
300 A.D.2d 371 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
Case details for

McKenzie v. Ostreich

Case Details

Full title:CAROL McKENZIE, ET AL., respondents, v. RICHARD A. OSTREICH, ETC.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 9, 2002

Citations

300 A.D.2d 371 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
751 N.Y.S.2d 762

Citing Cases

Public Administrator of Kings County v. Hossain Construction Corp.

We reverse. Leave to amend pleadings shall be "freely given" in the absence of prejudice or surprise to the…

Novack v. New York City Dept. of Education

It must be lateness coupled with significant prejudice to the other side, the very elements of the laches…