From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McKee-Blackham v. Blackham

Supreme Court of Nevada.
Dec 16, 2016
386 P.3d 996 (Nev. 2016)

Opinion

No. 71763

12-16-2016

Martha McKee-Blackham, Appellant, v. Brian E. Blackham, Respondent.

Martha McKee–Blackham Fine Carman Price


Martha McKee–Blackham

Fine Carman Price

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

This is a pro se appeal from an order denying a motion for reconsideration. Eighth Judicial District Court, Family Court Division, Clark County; Jennifer Elliott, Judge.

Our review of the documents submitted to this court pursuant to NRAP 3(g) reveals a jurisdictional defect. Specifically, it appears that the judgment or order designated in the notice of appeal is not substantively appealable. See NRAP 3A(b). This court lacks jurisdiction to consider an appeal from an order denying reconsideration. See Arnold v. Kip, 123 Nev. 410, 417, 168 P.3d 1050, 1054 (2007) ; Alois v. State, Gaming Control Bd., 99 Nev. 184, 660 P.2d 980 (1983), disapproved of on other grounds by AA Primo Builders v, Washington, 126 Nev. 578, 245 P.3d 1190 (2010). Accordingly, we conclude that we lack jurisdiction and we

ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.


Summaries of

McKee-Blackham v. Blackham

Supreme Court of Nevada.
Dec 16, 2016
386 P.3d 996 (Nev. 2016)
Case details for

McKee-Blackham v. Blackham

Case Details

Full title:Martha McKee-Blackham, Appellant, v. Brian E. Blackham, Respondent.

Court:Supreme Court of Nevada.

Date published: Dec 16, 2016

Citations

386 P.3d 996 (Nev. 2016)