From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McIntyre v. NaphCare Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Sep 26, 2017
2:16-cv-02107-JCM-PAL (D. Nev. Sep. 26, 2017)

Opinion

2:16-cv-02107-JCM-PAL

09-26-2017

DWIGHT MCINTYRE, Plaintiff, v. NAPHCARE INC. et al., Defendants.


ORDER

I. DISCUSSION

On July 13, 2017 and August 24, 2017, this Court entered a screening order and a follow up order, respectively, permitting this action to proceed against Defendants Frank Ryan, Brian Poirier, and Ted Hanf for deliberate indifference to serious medical needs (Counts I and II) only. (ECF No. 4 at 8-9; ECF No. 6 at 1). The Court stayed the case for 90 days to give Plaintiff and Defendants an opportunity to settle their dispute before the filing fee was paid, an answer was filed, or the discovery process began. (ECF No. 6 at 2). The Court directed the Attorney General's Office to notify the Court whether it would enter a limited notice of appearance on behalf of Defendants for the purpose of settlement. (Id. at 3).

On September 12, 2017, the Attorney General's Office informed the Court that it could not make a limited appearance for the purpose of settlement because none of the remaining defendants were currently employed by the Nevada Department of Corrections. (ECF No. 7 at 1).

In light of the Attorney General Office's notice, the Court now orders the Attorney General's Office to send letters to Defendants Frank Ryan, Brian Poirier, and Ted Hanf at their last known addresses informing them that they are defendants in this lawsuit. In the letters, the Attorney General's Office shall ask Defendants Frank Ryan, Brian Poirier, and Ted Hanf if they would like the Office to represent them in this matter. Within 30 days from the date of this order, the Attorney General's Office shall file an updated notice with the Court informing the Court whether it will be entering a limited notice of appearance on behalf of Defendants Frank Ryan, Brian Poirier, and Ted Hanf for the purpose of settlement in light of those letters.

If the Attorney General's Office enters a limited notice of appearance on behalf of Defendants Frank Ryan, Brian Poirier, and Ted Hanf for the purpose of settlement, the Court shall schedule an early inmate mediation conference. However, if the Attorney General's Office notifies the Court that it will not be entering a limited notice of appearance in light of its communication with Defendants Frank Ryan, Brian Poirier, and Ted Hanf , the Court will issue an order that: (1) removes this case from the early inmate mediation program, (2) rules on the application to proceed in forma pauperis, and (3) begins the service process with the U.S. Marshal's Office.

II. CONCLUSION

For the foregoing reasons, IT IS ORDERED that the Attorney General's Office shall send letters to Defendants Frank Ryan, Brian Poirier, and Ted Hanf at their last known addresses informing them of this lawsuit and asking whether they seek to have the Office represent them for the limited purpose of settlement.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, within 30 days from the date of this order, the Attorney General's Office shall file an updated notice with the Court informing the Court about Defendants Frank Ryan, Brian Poirier, and Ted Hanf's representation statuses.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, within 30 days from the date of this order, the Attorney General's Office shall advise the Court whether it will enter a limited notice of appearance on behalf of Defendants Frank Ryan, Brian Poirier, and Ted Hanf for the purpose of settlement. No defenses or objections, including lack of service, shall be waived as a result of the filing of the limited notice of appearance. / / / / / / / / /

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, if this case remains in the early inmate mediation program, the Court extends the 90-day stay and the deadline for the 90-day stay status report until 5 days after any scheduled mediation.

DATED: This 26th day of September, 2017.

/s/_________

United States Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

McIntyre v. NaphCare Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Sep 26, 2017
2:16-cv-02107-JCM-PAL (D. Nev. Sep. 26, 2017)
Case details for

McIntyre v. NaphCare Inc.

Case Details

Full title:DWIGHT MCINTYRE, Plaintiff, v. NAPHCARE INC. et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Sep 26, 2017

Citations

2:16-cv-02107-JCM-PAL (D. Nev. Sep. 26, 2017)