From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McIntosh v. Williams

United States District Court, District of Minnesota
Feb 2, 2024
23-cv-2696 (JMB/LIB) (D. Minn. Feb. 2, 2024)

Opinion

23-cv-2696 (JMB/LIB)

02-02-2024

Patrick Randell McIntosh, Petitioner, v. Eric Williams, Respondent.


ORDER ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Jeffrey M. Bryan, Judge United States District Court.

The Court has received the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois. (Doc. No. 10.) No party objected to that Report and Recommendation, and the Court therefore reviews it for clear error. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam). Finding no clear error, and based upon all the files, records, and proceedings in the above-captioned matter, IT IS ORDERED THAT:

1. The Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 10) is ADOPTED; and

2. Petitioner Patrick Randell McIntosh's Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus Under 28 U.S.C. § 2241, (Doc. No. 1), is DENIED;

3. Petitioner's two Applications to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs, (Doc. Nos. 4, 8), are DENIED as moot.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.


Summaries of

McIntosh v. Williams

United States District Court, District of Minnesota
Feb 2, 2024
23-cv-2696 (JMB/LIB) (D. Minn. Feb. 2, 2024)
Case details for

McIntosh v. Williams

Case Details

Full title:Patrick Randell McIntosh, Petitioner, v. Eric Williams, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, District of Minnesota

Date published: Feb 2, 2024

Citations

23-cv-2696 (JMB/LIB) (D. Minn. Feb. 2, 2024)