From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McIntosh v. Rardin

United States District Court, District of Minnesota
Jan 4, 2024
23-CV-2311 (NEB/JFD) (D. Minn. Jan. 4, 2024)

Opinion

23-CV-2311 (NEB/JFD)

01-04-2024

PATRICK RANDELL MCINTOSH, Petitioner, v. JARED RARDIN, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

NANCY E. BRASEL, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

The Court has received the November 22, 2023 Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge John F. Docherty. (ECF No. 8.) No party has objected to that Report and Recommendation, and the Court therefore reviews it for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam). Finding no clear error, and based upon all the files, records, and proceedings in the above-captioned matter, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

1. The Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 8) is ACCEPTED;
2. Patrick Randell McIntosh's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus under 28 U.S.C. Section 2241 (ECF No. 1) is DENIED;
3. The action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; and
4. McIntosh's Application to Proceed in District Court Without Pre-paying Fees or Costs (ECF No. 4) is DENIED AS MOOT.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.


Summaries of

McIntosh v. Rardin

United States District Court, District of Minnesota
Jan 4, 2024
23-CV-2311 (NEB/JFD) (D. Minn. Jan. 4, 2024)
Case details for

McIntosh v. Rardin

Case Details

Full title:PATRICK RANDELL MCINTOSH, Petitioner, v. JARED RARDIN, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, District of Minnesota

Date published: Jan 4, 2024

Citations

23-CV-2311 (NEB/JFD) (D. Minn. Jan. 4, 2024)