From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McInnis v. Co Wade Strand

United States District Court, D. North Dakota, Southwestern Division
Jun 26, 2008
Case No. 1:08-cv-054 (D.N.D. Jun. 26, 2008)

Opinion

Case No. 1:08-cv-054.

June 26, 2008


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION


The plaintiff, Robert McInnis, filed this pro se civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on May 20, 2008. See Docket No. 3. Magistrate Judge Charles S. Miller, Jr. conducted an initial review of McInnis's complaint as mandated by 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. On May 27, 2008, Judge Miller submitted a Report and Recommendation. See Docket No. 7. Judge Miller recommended that McInnis be permitted to file an amended complaint with the Court by June 25, 2008, subject to additional screening pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A, and absent an amended complaint that all claims be dismissed without prejudice. McInnis was then given until June 25, 2008, to file either an amended complaint or an objection to the Report and Recommendation. No amended complaint or objection was filed.

The Court has carefully reviewed the Report and Recommendation, relevant case law, and the entire record and finds the Report and Recommendation to be persuasive. The Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation (Docket No. 7) in its entirety. As a result, the Court ORDERS that McInnis's application to proceed in forma pauperis (Docket No. 3) is DENIED, and McInnis's claims are DISMISSED without prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

McInnis v. Co Wade Strand

United States District Court, D. North Dakota, Southwestern Division
Jun 26, 2008
Case No. 1:08-cv-054 (D.N.D. Jun. 26, 2008)
Case details for

McInnis v. Co Wade Strand

Case Details

Full title:Robert Lamar McInnis III, Plaintiff, v. CO Wade Strand, Defendants

Court:United States District Court, D. North Dakota, Southwestern Division

Date published: Jun 26, 2008

Citations

Case No. 1:08-cv-054 (D.N.D. Jun. 26, 2008)