From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McHenry v. Vasquez

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California, Western Division
Jan 28, 2011
CV 10-5344-R (PLA) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 28, 2011)

Opinion


ROYAL PORTER McHENRY, Petitioner, v. PAT VASQUEZ, Warden, Respondent. No. CV 10-5344-R (PLA) United States District Court, C.D. California, Western Division. January 28, 2011

          ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S SECOND REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

          MANUEL L. REAL, District Judge.

         Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the entire file de novo, including the magistrate judge's report and recommendation, and petitioner's objections to the report and recommendation. The Court agrees with the recommendations of the magistrate judge.

         ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED:

         1. The report and recommendation is adopted.

         2. Judgment shall be entered consistent with this order.

         3. The clerk shall serve this order and the judgment on all counsel or parties of record.


Summaries of

McHenry v. Vasquez

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California, Western Division
Jan 28, 2011
CV 10-5344-R (PLA) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 28, 2011)
Case details for

McHenry v. Vasquez

Case Details

Full title:ROYAL PORTER McHENRY, Petitioner, v. PAT VASQUEZ, Warden, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California, Western Division

Date published: Jan 28, 2011

Citations

CV 10-5344-R (PLA) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 28, 2011)