From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McHaney v. Villa Creek GP, LLC

COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS
Aug 16, 2017
No. 08-17-00099-CV (Tex. App. Aug. 16, 2017)

Opinion

No. 08-17-00099-CV

08-16-2017

JOE MARK MCHANEY AND CAROLYN B. MCHANEY, Appellants, v. VILLA CREEK GP, LLC, Appellee.


Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 1 of Tarrant County, Texas (TC# 2017-000724-1) MEMORANDUM OPINION

This appeal is before the Court on its own motion to determine whether it should be dismissed for want of prosecution. Finding that Appellants, Joe Mark McHaney and Carolyn B. McHaney, have failed to file their brief or a motion for extension of time to file the brief, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution.

The Clerk of the Court notified Appellants that their brief was past due and no motion for extension of time had been filed. The letter advised Appellants that the Court intended to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless Appellants responded within ten days and showed grounds for continuing the appeal. See TEX.R.APP.P. 38.8(a)(1). Appellants have not filed the brief or an extension motion, and they have not filed any response to the Court's inquiry. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See TEX.R.APP.P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b), (c).

GINA M. PALAFOX, Justice August 16, 2017 Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Palafox, JJ.


Summaries of

McHaney v. Villa Creek GP, LLC

COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS
Aug 16, 2017
No. 08-17-00099-CV (Tex. App. Aug. 16, 2017)
Case details for

McHaney v. Villa Creek GP, LLC

Case Details

Full title:JOE MARK MCHANEY AND CAROLYN B. MCHANEY, Appellants, v. VILLA CREEK GP…

Court:COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS

Date published: Aug 16, 2017

Citations

No. 08-17-00099-CV (Tex. App. Aug. 16, 2017)