From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McHaney v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Jun 19, 2020
No. 81271 (Nev. Jun. 19, 2020)

Opinion

No. 81271

06-19-2020

GENEALYNN MCHANEY, Petitioner, v. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CLARK; AND THE HONORABLE MARGARET E. PICKARD, MAGISTRATE JUDGE, DEPENDENCY 1, Respondents, and CLARK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF FAMILY SERVICES; AND M.J.A., A MINOR, Real Parties in Interest.


ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS OR PROHIBITION

This original petition for a writ of mandamus or prohibition challenges a June 5, 2020, hearing master recommendation denying petitioner's motion to maintain placement of the subject child in the underlying dependency proceedings. Real parties in interest have timely filed answers to the petition, as directed.

As real party in interest's proposed appendix, provisionally received in this court on June 18, 2020, contains confidential information filed under-seal in the district court, its motion for leave to file the appendix under seal is granted. SRCR 3(4)(a), (7); see NRS 432B.280. The clerk of this court shall file the appendix under seal.

Having reviewed the petition, answers, and supporting documentation, we conclude that our extraordinary intervention is not warranted at this time. See Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004) (observing that the party seeking writ relief bears the burden of showing such relief is warranted); Smith v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 107 Nev. 674, 677, 679, 818 P.2d 849, 851, 853 (1991) (recognizing that writ relief is an extraordinary remedy and that this court has sole discretion in determining whether to entertain a writ petition). Although petitioner appears to have raised valid concerns with the hearing master's interpretation of NRS 432B.550(6)(b), analysis of the child's best interest, and failure to hold an evidentiary hearing, petitioner has not yet obtained the supervising district judge's review of her objection to the hearing master's recommendation. See EDCR 1.46. Accordingly, we conclude that this petition is premature and

ORDER the petition DENIED.

/s/_________, J.

Parraguirre

/s/_________, J.

Hardesty

/s/_________, J.

Cadish cc: Margaret E. Pickard, Hearing Master

Smith Legal Group

Legal Aid Center of Southern Nevada, Inc.

Clark County District Attorney/Juvenile Division

Eighth District Court Clerk


Summaries of

McHaney v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Jun 19, 2020
No. 81271 (Nev. Jun. 19, 2020)
Case details for

McHaney v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court

Case Details

Full title:GENEALYNN MCHANEY, Petitioner, v. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

Date published: Jun 19, 2020

Citations

No. 81271 (Nev. Jun. 19, 2020)