From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McGuffin v. Dannels

United States District Court, District of Oregon
Dec 28, 2022
6:20-cv-01163-MK (D. Or. Dec. 28, 2022)

Opinion

6:20-cv-01163-MK

12-28-2022

NICHOLAS JAMES MCGUFFIN and S.M., Plaintiffs, v. MARK DANNELS; PAT DOWNING; SUSAN HORMANN; MARY KRINGS; KRIS KARCHER; SHELLY MCINNES; RAYMOND MCNEELY; KIP OSWALD; MICHAEL REAVES; JOHN RIDDLE; SEAN SANBORN; ERIC SCHWENNIGER; RICHARD WALTER; CHRIS WEBLEY; ANTHONY WETMORE; KATHY CRAIG ZANNI; DAVID ZALAVA; JOEL D. SHAPIRO as administrator of ESTATE OF DAVE HALL; VIDOCQ SOCIETY; CITY OF COQUILLE; CITY OF COOS BAY; COOS COUNTY; and OREGON STATE POLICE, Defendants.


ORDER

Michael McShane United States District Judge

Magistrate Judge Mustafa T. Kasubhai filed a Findings and Recommendation (ECF No. 128), and the matter is now before this court on Plaintiffs and Defendants objections. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), Fed.R.Civ.P. 72. I review de novo. United States v. Bernhardt, 840 F.2d 1441, 1445 (9th Cir. 1998). I find no error and conclude the report is correct.

Magistrate Judge Kasubhai's Findings and Recommendation (ECF No. 128) is adopted in full. Oregon State Police's motion for partial dismissal (ECF No. 120) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part, consistent with Judge Kasubhai's Findings and Recommendation. The Court clarifies that the First Claim for Relief: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 - Unconstitutional Policies, Practices, and Customs of Defendant Oregon State Police - in the Complaint for Damages (ECF No. 1) for the trailing case, 3:21-cv-1719-MK, is DISMISSED with prejudice. State Defendants' motion for partial dismissal (ECF No. 104) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part, consistent with Judge Kasubhai's Findings and Recommendation. Municipal Defendants' motion for partial dismissal (ECF No. 105) is DENIED, consistent with Judge Kasubhai's Findings and Recommendation. Vidoq Defendants' motion for partial dismissal (ECF No. 106) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part, consistent with Judge Kasubhai's Findings and Recommendation.

Plaintiffs are granted leave to file an amended complaint within thirty days.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

McGuffin v. Dannels

United States District Court, District of Oregon
Dec 28, 2022
6:20-cv-01163-MK (D. Or. Dec. 28, 2022)
Case details for

McGuffin v. Dannels

Case Details

Full title:NICHOLAS JAMES MCGUFFIN and S.M., Plaintiffs, v. MARK DANNELS; PAT…

Court:United States District Court, District of Oregon

Date published: Dec 28, 2022

Citations

6:20-cv-01163-MK (D. Or. Dec. 28, 2022)