McGregor Printing Corp. v. Kemp

4 Citing cases

  1. McGregor Printing Corp. v. Kemp

    811 F. Supp. 10 (D.D.C. 1993)   Cited 5 times

    JOHN H. PRATT, District Judge. In this action, plaintiff McGregor Printing Corporation ("McGregor") has moved for a stay of this Court's Order of September 30, 1992, McGregor Printing Corp. v. Kemp, et al., 802 F. Supp. 519 (D.D.C. 1992), pending appeal of that decision. For the reasons given below, we deny plaintiff's motion.

  2. Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Thompson

    Civil Action No.: 00-2876 (RMU) (D.D.C. Mar. 14, 2001)

    It is true that this court has found irreparable harm where the moving party made a "strong showing that economic loss would significantly damage its business above and beyond a simple diminution in profits." See Mylan, 81 F. Supp.2d at 42; Express One Int'l, Inc. v. United States Postal Serv., 814 F. Supp. 87, 91 (D.D.C. 1992) (bidder demonstrated irreparable injury where loss of ten-year $1 billion contract would cause annual loss of $130 million, would impair bidder's relationships with subcontractors and would likely cause capital costs and layoffs); McGregor Printing Corp. v. Kemp, 1992 WL 118794, *5 (D.D.C. 1992)("the irretrievable monetary loss in combination with the loss in employment to [plaintiff's] employees" amounted to irreparable harm). In this case, Mylan has not shown that its economic losses would be either "irretrievable" or "would significantly damage its business above and beyond a simple diminution in profits."

  3. Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Thompson

    139 F. Supp. 2d 1 (D.D.C. 2001)   Cited 17 times
    Recognizing that to satisfy the standard of irreparable injury to justify a preliminary injunction, the movants' loss must be "more than simply irretrievable"

    It is true that this court has found irreparable harm where the moving party made a "strong showing that economic loss would significantly damage its business above and beyond a simple diminution in profits." See Mylan, 81 F.Supp.2d at 42; Express One Int'l, Inc. v. United States Postal Serv., 814 F.Supp. 87, 91 (D.D.C. 1992) (bidder demonstrated irreparable injury where loss of ten-year $1 billion contract would cause annual loss of $130 million, would impair bidder's relationships with subcontractors and would likely cause capital costs and layoffs); McGregor Printing Corp. v. Kemp, 1992 WL 118794, *5 (D.D.C. 1992) ("the irretrievable monetary loss . . . in combination with the loss in employment to [plaintiff's] employees" amounted to irreparable harm). In this case, Mylan has not shown that its economic losses would be either "irretrievable" or "would significantly damage its business above and beyond a simple diminution in profits."

  4. Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Henney

    94 F. Supp. 2d 36 (D.D.C. 2000)   Cited 24 times
    Finding Barr no longer eligible for the 180-day exclusivity period for tamoxifen citrate

    This court, however, has found irreparable harm where the moving party made a "strong showing that the economic loss would significantly damage its business above and beyond a simple diminution in profits." See Mylan 2000, 81 F. Supp.2d at 42; Express One Int'l Inc. v. United States Postal Serv., 814 F. Supp. 87, 91 (D.D.C. 1992) (holding that a bidder demonstrated irreparable injury where loss of 10-year $1 billion contract would cause annual loss of $130 million, would impair bidder's relationships with subcontractors and would likely cause capital costs and lay-offs of employees); McGregor Printing Corp. v. Kemp, 1992 WL 118794, *5 (D.D.C. 1992) ("the irretrievable monetary loss . . . in combination with the loss in employment to [plaintiff's] employees" amounted to irreparable harm). Neither Mylan nor Pharmachemie (1) asserts excessive economic loss, (2) asserts claims of economic or market loss beyond that which is purely speculative or (3) claims injuries beyond economic or market-share loss. (Mylan's Mot. for Prelim.Inj. at 24-25; Pharm.'s Mot. for Prelim.Inj. at 38.)