From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McGowan v. City of Eugene

Oregon Court of Appeals
Jul 18, 1990
795 P.2d 563 (Or. Ct. App. 1990)

Opinion

89-078; CA A62779

Argued and submitted January 8, 1990

Affirmed July 18, 1990.

Judicial Review from Land Use Board of Appeals.

Michael E. Farthing, Eugene, argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the brief was Linda Y. Lee, Eugene.

Timothy J. Sercombe, Eugene, argued the cause for respondent City of Eugene. With him on the brief was Harrang, Long, Watkinson, Arnold Laird, P.C., Eugene.

William Kloos, Eugene, argued the cause for respondent Cuddeback Investments. With him on the brief was Johnson Kloos, Eugene.

Before Buttler, Presiding Judge, and Joseph, Chief Judge, and Rossman, Judge.


PER CURIAM

Affirmed.


Petitioners seek review of LUBA's affirmance of the City of Eugene's rezoning of a 29-acre area. The city allowed the zone change after the Lane County Local Government Boundary Commission ordered the annexation of the area to the city. Petitioners also sought our review of the boundary commission's annexation order. In McGowan v. Lane County Local Govt. Bdry. Comm., 102 Or. App. 381, 795 P.2d 560 (1990), we affirmed the annexation order.

Petitioners' arguments for reversing LUBA's decision are without merit and do not require discussion.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

McGowan v. City of Eugene

Oregon Court of Appeals
Jul 18, 1990
795 P.2d 563 (Or. Ct. App. 1990)
Case details for

McGowan v. City of Eugene

Case Details

Full title:Robert McGOWAN and Coeta McGowan, Petitioners, v. CITY OF EUGENE, and…

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: Jul 18, 1990

Citations

795 P.2d 563 (Or. Ct. App. 1990)
795 P.2d 563