From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McGovern v. Safir

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 18, 1999
266 A.D.2d 107 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

November 18, 1999

Joseph R. Maddalone, Jr. for Petitioner.

Cheryl Payer for Respondent.

SULLIVAN, J.P., NARDELLI, MAZZARELLI, LERNER, BUCKLEY, JJ.


Determination of respondent Police Commissioner, dated November 14, 1997, which dismissed petitioner from his position as a police officer, unanimously confirmed, the petition denied and the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, New York County [Stanley Parness, J.], entered June 12, 1998) dismissed, without costs.

Petitioner's positive random drug test results, which petitioner does not dispute, constitute substantial evidence supporting the determination that petitioner possessed and ingested marijuana. There is no basis upon which to disturb the Deputy Commissioner's rejection, as incredible, of petitioner's claim that his ingestion of marijuana was unknowing and involuntary (see,Matter of Berenhaus v. Ward, 70 N.Y.2d 436; Matter of Gaudioso v. Correction Commissioner of the City of New York, 221 A.D.2d 165). The penalty of dismissal does not shock our sense of fairness.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

McGovern v. Safir

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 18, 1999
266 A.D.2d 107 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

McGovern v. Safir

Case Details

Full title:Application of JOHN McGOVERN, Petitioner, For a Judgment, etc., v. HOWARD…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Nov 18, 1999

Citations

266 A.D.2d 107 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
698 N.Y.S.2d 477

Citing Cases

Kelly v. Scoppetta

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, the petition is denied, and the proceeding is dismissed on the…

In the Matter of Williams v. Nicoletti

Accordingly, contrary to the petitioner's argument, the hearing officer's factual determinations must be…