From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McGore v. U.S. Supreme Court Justices

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Oct 31, 2019
Civil Action No. 1:19-cv-02806 (UNA) (D.D.C. Oct. 31, 2019)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 1:19-cv-02806 (UNA)

10-31-2019

DARRYL MCGORE, Plaintiff, v. U.S. SUPREME COURT JUSTICES, Defendants.


MEMORANDUM OPINION

This matter is before the court on its initial review of plaintiff's pro se complaint and application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis ("IFP"). The court will grant the IFP application and dismiss the case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(h)(3).

Plaintiff is a prisoner designated to Baraga Correctional Facility, located in Baraga, Michigan. He alleges that his constitutional rights have been violated due to the denial of his attempts to proceed before the United States Supreme Court, and as a result, he now sues the Supreme Court Justices. He asks that this court "reopen the U.S. Supreme Court decisions."

This court lacks subject matter jurisdiction over matters arising from the decisions of the Supreme Court. In re Marin, 956 F.2d 339 (D.C. Cir. 1992); see 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331, 1332 (general jurisdictional provisions); Panko v. Rodak, 606 F. 2d 168, 171 n.6 (7th Cir. 1979) ("[I]t it seems axiomatic that a lower court may not order the judges or officers of a higher court to take an action."), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1081 (1980); United States v. Choi, 818 F. Supp. 2d 79, 85 (D.D.C. 2011) (stating that federal district courts "generally lack[] appellate jurisdiction over other judicial bodies, and cannot exercise appellate mandamus over other courts") (citing Lewis v. Green, 629 F. Supp. 546, 553 (D.D.C. 1986)); Fleming v. United States, 847 F. Supp. 170, 172 (D.D.C. 1994) (applying District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. Feldman, 460 U.S. 462, 482 (1983), and Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co., 263 U.S. 413, 415, 416 (1923)), aff'd, No. 94-5079, 1994 WL 474995 (D.C. Cir. 1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1150 (1995).

Plaintiff has thus failed to establish subject matter jurisdiction. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(h)(3). As a result, this case is dismissed. A separate order of dismissal accompanies this memorandum opinion.

/s/_________

CHRISTOPHER R. COOPER

United States District Judge Date: October 31, 2019


Summaries of

McGore v. U.S. Supreme Court Justices

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Oct 31, 2019
Civil Action No. 1:19-cv-02806 (UNA) (D.D.C. Oct. 31, 2019)
Case details for

McGore v. U.S. Supreme Court Justices

Case Details

Full title:DARRYL MCGORE, Plaintiff, v. U.S. SUPREME COURT JUSTICES, Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Date published: Oct 31, 2019

Citations

Civil Action No. 1:19-cv-02806 (UNA) (D.D.C. Oct. 31, 2019)