From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McGill v. Colvin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Jun 19, 2014
5:14-CV-0601 (LEK/CFH) (N.D.N.Y. Jun. 19, 2014)

Summary

holding a single-examination CE's report containing "restrictive analysis and opinion that plaintiff has ‘marked’ limitations in her ability to perform work related functions" to be insufficient

Summary of this case from Jamison v. Acting Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

Opinion

5:14-CV-0601 (LEK/CFH)

06-19-2014

JAMIE MCGILL, Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Defendant.


ORDER

This matter comes before the Court following a Report-Recommendation filed on May 22, 2014, by the Honorable Christian F. Hummel, U.S. Magistrate Judge, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Local Rule 72.3. Dkt. No. 12 ("Report-Recommendation").

Within fourteen days after a party has been served with a copy of a magistrate judge's report-recommendation, the party "may serve and file specific, written objections to the proposed findings and recommendations." FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b); L.R. 72.1(c). "If no objections are filed . . . reviewing courts should review a report and recommendation for clear error." Edwards v. Fischer, 414 F. Supp. 2d 342, 346-47 (S.D.N.Y. 2006); see also Cephas v. Nash, 328 F.3d 98, 107 (2d Cir. 2003) ("As a rule, a party's failure to object to any purported error or omission in a magistrate judge's report waives further judicial review of the point."); Farid v. Bouey, 554 F. Supp. 2d 301, 306 (N.D.N.Y. 2008).

No objections to the Report-Recommendation were filed in the allotted time period. See Docket. After a thorough review of the Report-Recommendation and the record, the Court has determined that the Report-Recommendation is not subject to attack for clear error or manifest injustice.

Accordingly, it is hereby:

ORDERED, that the Report-Recommendation (Dkt. No. 12) is APPROVED and ADOPTED in its entirety; and it is further

ORDERED, that the Commissioner's decision denying disability benefits is AFFIRMED; and it is further

ORDERED, that Plaintiff's Motion (Dkt. No. 8) for judgment on the pleadings is DENIED; and it is further

ORDERED, that the Clerk of the Court enter judgment for Defendant and close this case; and it is further

ORDERED, that the Clerk of the Court serve a copy of this Order on the parties to this action in accordance with the Local Rules.

IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: June 19, 2014

Albany, New York

__________

Lawrence E. Kahn

U.S. District Judge


Summaries of

McGill v. Colvin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Jun 19, 2014
5:14-CV-0601 (LEK/CFH) (N.D.N.Y. Jun. 19, 2014)

holding a single-examination CE's report containing "restrictive analysis and opinion that plaintiff has ‘marked’ limitations in her ability to perform work related functions" to be insufficient

Summary of this case from Jamison v. Acting Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

holding a single-examination CE's report containing "restrictive analysis and opinion that plaintiff has 'marked' limitations in her ability to perform work related functions" to be insufficient

Summary of this case from Romero v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.
Case details for

McGill v. Colvin

Case Details

Full title:JAMIE MCGILL, Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Jun 19, 2014

Citations

5:14-CV-0601 (LEK/CFH) (N.D.N.Y. Jun. 19, 2014)

Citing Cases

Romero v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

Courts within the Second Circuit have found remand appropriate when an ALJ bases an RFC evaluation on general…

Leonard v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

A reading of the ALJ's decision indicated that he conducted a thorough analysis and "employed the proper…