From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McGhee v. Lipscomb

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE WESTERN DIVISION
Aug 10, 2015
No. 2:15-cv-02023-JPM-tmp (W.D. Tenn. Aug. 10, 2015)

Summary

declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the plaintiff's state-law claims after dismissing the federal claims pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e) for failure to state a claim

Summary of this case from Hardy v. Johnston

Opinion

No. 2:15-cv-02023-JPM-tmp

08-10-2015

WALTER MCGHEE, II, Plaintiff, v. ROBERT LIPSCOMB, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION; AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Before the Court is the Magistrate Judge's report and recommendation, filed July 14, 2015. (ECF No. 5.) In the report and recommendation, the Magistrate Judge recommends "that McGhee's federal claims be dismissed for failure to state a claim pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) and 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) as to all the defendants, and that the court decline jurisdiction over the remaining state law claims based on 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c)(3)." (ECF No. 5 at 17.)

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b)(2), "[w]ithin 14 days after being served with a copy of the recommended disposition, a party may serve and file specific written objections to the proposed findings and recommendations." Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2). No objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed, and the time for filing objections expired on July 31, 2015. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(b)(2), 6(d), 72(b)(2).

"When no timely objection is filed, the court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation." Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) advisory committee notes. On clear-error review of the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, the Court hereby ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 5) in its entirety.

Accordingly, Plaintiff Walter McGhee, II's federal claims are hereby DISMISSED as to all defendants for failure to state a claim pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). Additionally, the Court declines to exercise jurisdiction over the remaining state law claims pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c)(3).

IT IS SO ORDERED, this 10th day of August, 2015.

/s/ Jon P. McCalla

JON P. McCALLA

U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE


Summaries of

McGhee v. Lipscomb

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE WESTERN DIVISION
Aug 10, 2015
No. 2:15-cv-02023-JPM-tmp (W.D. Tenn. Aug. 10, 2015)

declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the plaintiff's state-law claims after dismissing the federal claims pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e) for failure to state a claim

Summary of this case from Hardy v. Johnston
Case details for

McGhee v. Lipscomb

Case Details

Full title:WALTER MCGHEE, II, Plaintiff, v. ROBERT LIPSCOMB, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE WESTERN DIVISION

Date published: Aug 10, 2015

Citations

No. 2:15-cv-02023-JPM-tmp (W.D. Tenn. Aug. 10, 2015)

Citing Cases

Hardy v. Johnston

As for Plaintiff's state-law claims, I recommend that the Court dismiss them without prejudice pursuant to 28…

Budd v. Landings at Preserve

That is, Budd merely alleges the ultimate conclusion of discrimination without an adequate supporting factual…