From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McGhee v. Jaime-Daumy

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Mar 7, 2023
20-cv-05135-HSG (N.D. Cal. Mar. 7, 2023)

Opinion

20-cv-05135-HSG

03-07-2023

TIJUE ADOLPHUS MCGHEE, Plaintiff, v. R. JAIME-DAUMY, et al., Defendants.


ORDER DENYING REQUEST FOR CONTINUANCE

RE: DKT. NO. 27

HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

This pro se civil rights action against San Quentin State Prison (“SQSP”) officers Jaime-Daumy and Wren was dismissed on March 22, 2021 for failure to prosecute. Dkt. No. 16. Plaintiff has filed a motion in this closed case, requesting a continuance from the Court of Appeals “for a final judgment ‘in the furtherance of justice' grant punitive damages, monetary damages, and all other relief awarded to the Plaintiff as the Court deems fit.” Dkt. No. 16 at 3. Plaintiff states that he presented documents to the Court of Appeals in 2020. Dkt. No. 16 at 2. Plaintiffs request is DENIED. If Plaintiff wishes to seek relief from the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, he should file such a request with the Court of Appeals, and not with this Court. This Court cannot order the Court of Appeals to grant Plaintiff relief. If Plaintiff is requesting judgment in his favor in this case, that request is DENIED as this case is closed and judgment has already been entered in favor of Defendants. Dkt. Nos. 16, 17.

This order terminates Dkt. No. 27. This case remains closed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

McGhee v. Jaime-Daumy

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Mar 7, 2023
20-cv-05135-HSG (N.D. Cal. Mar. 7, 2023)
Case details for

McGhee v. Jaime-Daumy

Case Details

Full title:TIJUE ADOLPHUS MCGHEE, Plaintiff, v. R. JAIME-DAUMY, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Mar 7, 2023

Citations

20-cv-05135-HSG (N.D. Cal. Mar. 7, 2023)