From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McGee v. Hoppe

United States District Court, D. Oregon
Apr 4, 2009
Civil No. 08-1251-TC (D. Or. Apr. 4, 2009)

Opinion

Civil No. 08-1251-TC.

April 4, 2009


ORDER


Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Coffin filed his Findings and Recommendation on February 26, 2009. The matter is now before me.See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b). No objections have been timely filed. This relieves me of my obligation to give the factual findings de novo review. Lorin Corp. v. Goto Co., Ltd., 700 F.2d 1202, 1206 (9th Cir. 1982).See also Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, I find no error.

Accordingly, I ADOPT Judge Coffin's Findings and Recommendation. This action is dismissed for want of prosecution.


Summaries of

McGee v. Hoppe

United States District Court, D. Oregon
Apr 4, 2009
Civil No. 08-1251-TC (D. Or. Apr. 4, 2009)
Case details for

McGee v. Hoppe

Case Details

Full title:WAYNE P. McGEE, Plaintiff, v. SERGEANT HOPPE, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, D. Oregon

Date published: Apr 4, 2009

Citations

Civil No. 08-1251-TC (D. Or. Apr. 4, 2009)

Citing Cases

State Highway Department v. Rogers

"Under well settled rulings of the appellate courts, exhibits which are not contained or briefed in the…