From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McGee v. City of Palo Alto

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Sep 26, 2023
23-cv-02113-JD (N.D. Cal. Sep. 26, 2023)

Opinion

23-cv-02113-JD

09-26-2023

ANTHONY MCGEE, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF PALO ALTO, et al., Defendants.


ORDER RE DISMISSAL

JAMES DONATO UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

On July 27, 2023, plaintiff's complaint was dismissed with leave to amend, and plaintiff was advised that failure to file an amended complaint by August 17, 2023, would result in dismissal of the action under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). Dkt. No. 22. Because plaintiff did not file an amended complaint by that date, the case is dismissed without prejudice. The requests to substitute counsel for the defendants, Dkt. Nos. 24 & 25, are terminated as moot.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

McGee v. City of Palo Alto

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Sep 26, 2023
23-cv-02113-JD (N.D. Cal. Sep. 26, 2023)
Case details for

McGee v. City of Palo Alto

Case Details

Full title:ANTHONY MCGEE, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF PALO ALTO, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Sep 26, 2023

Citations

23-cv-02113-JD (N.D. Cal. Sep. 26, 2023)