From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McGary v. Culpepper

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA
Dec 19, 2011
CASE NO. C05-5376-RBL-JRC (W.D. Wash. Dec. 19, 2011)

Opinion

CASE NO. C05-5376-RBL-JRC

12-19-2011

DARNELL MCGARY, Plaintiff, v. RONALD CULPEPPER et al., Defendants


ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO CONTINUE

This 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights action has been referred to the undersigned Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Local Magistrate Judge Rules MJR 1, MJR 3, and MJR 4. Plaintiff asks the Court to continue a motion for summary judgment until plaintiff's counsel has had a chance to complete discovery (ECF No. 158).

When this action was remanded from the Ninth Circuit the Court entered a scheduling order (ECF No. 146). That order gave the parties four months, until September 30, 2011, to conduct discovery. The parties stipulated to extend the deadline and agreed to a discovery cutoff of March 30, 2012 (ECF No. 153). The motion for summary judgment filed in December would not allow the parties the benefit of the stipulation. The motion for a continuance is granted.

Discovery in this action will end on March 30, 2012. The defendant's motion for summary judgment, (ECF No. 157) is re-noted for April 27, 2012. The response to the motion will be due on or before April 20, 2012.

_____________

J. Richard Creatura

United States Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

McGary v. Culpepper

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA
Dec 19, 2011
CASE NO. C05-5376-RBL-JRC (W.D. Wash. Dec. 19, 2011)
Case details for

McGary v. Culpepper

Case Details

Full title:DARNELL MCGARY, Plaintiff, v. RONALD CULPEPPER et al., Defendants

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA

Date published: Dec 19, 2011

Citations

CASE NO. C05-5376-RBL-JRC (W.D. Wash. Dec. 19, 2011)