From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McGann v. Drennan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 12, 1937
252 App. Div. 863 (N.Y. App. Div. 1937)

Opinion

November 12, 1937.

Present — Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Close, JJ.


In an action to recover damages for personal injuries caused by the negligence of the defendants, judgment in favor of the plaintiff unanimously affirmed, without costs. In our opinion the verdict was not inadequate in amount. The charge with respect to the failure to call Dr. Silverman as a witness was incorrect; but in view of the verdict in favor of the plaintiff, and of our conclusion that the amount was not inadequate, we may, under section 106 of the Civil Practice Act, disregard the error. Appeal from order denying motion to set aside the verdict dismissed. There is no such order in the record.


Summaries of

McGann v. Drennan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 12, 1937
252 App. Div. 863 (N.Y. App. Div. 1937)
Case details for

McGann v. Drennan

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM McGANN, Appellant, v. JOSEPH F. DRENNAN and CLAUDE S. CROMIE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 12, 1937

Citations

252 App. Div. 863 (N.Y. App. Div. 1937)

Citing Cases

La Lima v. Fath

Nor do we approve the court's taking notice of life expectancy tables when the medical testimony on the…