From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McFarland v. Lee Cnty. Adult Det. Ctr.

United States District Court, N.D. Mississippi, Aberdeen Division
May 9, 2022
1:20CV64-GHD-RP (N.D. Miss. May. 9, 2022)

Opinion

1:20CV64-GHD-RP

05-09-2022

TAKEI GURMEANI MCFARLAND PLAINTIFF v. LEE CO. ADULT DETENTION CENTER, ET AL. DEFENDANTS


ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION [96] FOR DISCOVERY

ROY PERCY, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The plaintiff has filed a motion to conduct additional discovery in the present case proceeding under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 challenging the conditions of his confinement. Discovery in pro se prisoner conditions of confinement cases is limited to that set forth in the court's scheduling order. The plaintiff has not provided sufficient justification for discovery beyond the limits set forth in that order. As such, he is not entitled to conduct discovery at this time, and the motion is DENIED.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

McFarland v. Lee Cnty. Adult Det. Ctr.

United States District Court, N.D. Mississippi, Aberdeen Division
May 9, 2022
1:20CV64-GHD-RP (N.D. Miss. May. 9, 2022)
Case details for

McFarland v. Lee Cnty. Adult Det. Ctr.

Case Details

Full title:TAKEI GURMEANI MCFARLAND PLAINTIFF v. LEE CO. ADULT DETENTION CENTER, ET…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Mississippi, Aberdeen Division

Date published: May 9, 2022

Citations

1:20CV64-GHD-RP (N.D. Miss. May. 9, 2022)