From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McFarland v. Cal. Bank & Tr. (In re Int'l Mfg. Grp., Inc.)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Dec 21, 2016
CIV. NO. 2:16-2873 WBS (E.D. Cal. Dec. 21, 2016)

Opinion

CIV. NO. 2:16-2873 WBS BANKR. ADV. NO. 16-2090-D BANKR. NO. 14-25820-D-11

12-21-2016

In re INTERNATIONAL MANUFACTURING GROUP, INC., Debtor. BEVERLY N. McFARLAND, Chapter 11 Trustee, Plaintiff, v. CALIFORNIA BANK & TRUST, a California corporation; BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., a Delaware corporation; and JAMESTOWN S'KLALLAM TRIBE, Defendants.


ORDER ADOPTING THE BANKRUPTCY JUDGE'S PROPOSED FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

Plaintiff Beverly N. McFarland's adversary proceeding against ZB, N.A. (the "Bank"), doing business as California Bank & Trust, is currently pending in the bankruptcy court in connection with International Manufacturing Group, Inc.'s ("IMG") Chapter 11 case. In the bankruptcy court, the Bank filed a motion to dismiss plaintiff's first amended complaint. (Adv. No. 16-2090-D, Docket No. 85.) Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(c)(1), In re Bellingham Insurance Agency, Inc., 702 F.3d 553, 565 (9th Cir. 2012), and Executive Benefits Insurance Agency v. Arkison, 134 S. Ct. 2165, 2175 (2014), on December 6, 2016, the Bankruptcy Court submitted its proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law to this Court for review.

The district court reviews de novo a bankruptcy judge's proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law as to "those matters to which any party has timely and specifically objected." 28 U.S.C. § 157(c)(1); see also Fed. R. Bankr. P. 9033(d). Here, the parties have filed a stipulation, adopted by the bankruptcy court, which states that neither party would file objections to the bankruptcy court's decision and that they would consent to an order by the district court approving the findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 9033(b).

Upon de novo review, the court finds the proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law to be supported by the record and by proper analysis. Therefore, the court ADOPTS the Bankruptcy Judge's proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law (Docket No. 1) and, accordingly HEREBY ORDERS as follows:

1. Count 10 of the Amended Complaint is DISMISSED.

2. Count 9 is DISMISSED as to the five obligations incurred by IMG in favor of the Bank more than seven years before the commencement of IMG's chapter 11 case.

3. Counts 1, 2, and 4 are DISMISSED with respect to repayments made to the Bank on loans made to IMG outside the seven-year period. Dated: December 21, 2016

/s/_________

WILLIAM B. SHUBB

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

McFarland v. Cal. Bank & Tr. (In re Int'l Mfg. Grp., Inc.)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Dec 21, 2016
CIV. NO. 2:16-2873 WBS (E.D. Cal. Dec. 21, 2016)
Case details for

McFarland v. Cal. Bank & Tr. (In re Int'l Mfg. Grp., Inc.)

Case Details

Full title:In re INTERNATIONAL MANUFACTURING GROUP, INC., Debtor. BEVERLY N…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Dec 21, 2016

Citations

CIV. NO. 2:16-2873 WBS (E.D. Cal. Dec. 21, 2016)