From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McFadden v. Beard

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Apr 11, 2011
CIVIL ACTION NO. 09-5952 (E.D. Pa. Apr. 11, 2011)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 09-5952.

April 11, 2011


ORDER


AND NOW, this 11th day of APRIL, 2011, upon careful and independent consideration of the petition for writ of habeas corpus and accompanying brief, the response thereto, Petitioner's reply brief, and the state court record, and after review of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge David R. Strawbridge, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED;
2. The petition for a writ of habeas corpus is DENIED; and
3. There is no basis for the issuance of a certificate of appealability.

The Clerk of Court is directed to close this matter for statistical purposes.


Summaries of

McFadden v. Beard

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Apr 11, 2011
CIVIL ACTION NO. 09-5952 (E.D. Pa. Apr. 11, 2011)
Case details for

McFadden v. Beard

Case Details

Full title:KAMIL McFADDEN, Petitioner, v. JEFFREY BEARD, et al., Respondents

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Apr 11, 2011

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 09-5952 (E.D. Pa. Apr. 11, 2011)

Citing Cases

Smith v. Attorney Gen.

Darryl Smith's testimony was mostly tangential. See, e g, McFadden v. Beard, No. 09-5952, 2011 WL…