From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McDowell v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Nov 30, 1960
117 S.E.2d 886 (Ga. Ct. App. 1960)

Opinion

38573.

DECIDED NOVEMBER 30, 1960.

Involuntary manslaughter. Laurens Superior Court. Before Judge Stephens. August 4, 1960.

Al Hatcher, Rollin A. Stanley, for plaintiff in error.

Harold E. Ward, Solicitor-General, W. W. Larsen, Jr., Larsen Larsen, contra.


An approved brief of the evidence is essential to a valid motion for a new trial, and where, as in this case, the record shows that the trial judge overruled the motion for a new trial on the general grounds on August 4, 1960, and that no valid brief of the evidence was approved by him until August 31, 1960, the judgment overruling the motion was proper and must be affirmed. Since the trial judge did not have before him, at the time he entered the judgment, the brief of the evidence, the only legal judgment he could have rendered in the case was one of dismissal of the motion, but his judgment overruling it reaches the same result and, therefore, that judgment will not be disturbed. See Rich v. State, 74 Ga. 811; Gulick v. Mulcahy, 95 Ga. App. 158 ( 97 S.E.2d 362); Scales v. Neal, 96 Ga. App. 168 ( 99 S.E.2d 498). Cf. General Finance c. Corp. v. Davis, 97 Ga. App. 391 ( 103 S.E.2d 149).

Judgment affirmed. Townsend, P. J., Frankum and Jordan, JJ., concur.

DECIDED NOVEMBER 30, 1960.


Summaries of

McDowell v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Nov 30, 1960
117 S.E.2d 886 (Ga. Ct. App. 1960)
Case details for

McDowell v. State

Case Details

Full title:McDOWELL v. THE STATE

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Nov 30, 1960

Citations

117 S.E.2d 886 (Ga. Ct. App. 1960)
117 S.E.2d 886

Citing Cases

King v. State

2. It has been held that an approved brief of evidence is essential to a motion for new trial raising…