From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McDowell v. Richardson

United States District Court, D. Arizona
Oct 31, 2011
No. CV11-0716 PHX DGC (MEA) (D. Ariz. Oct. 31, 2011)

Opinion

No. CV11-0716 PHX DGC (MEA).

October 31, 2011


ORDER


Petitioner Theodore Cush McDowell has filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Doc. 1. United States Magistrate Judge Mark E. Aspey has issued a report and recommendation ("R R") recommending that the petition be denied. Doc. 14. No objection has been filed, which relieves the Court of its obligation to review the R R. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b)(3); Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003). The Court will accept the R R and deny the petition.

IT IS ORDERED:

1. The R R (Doc. 14) is accepted.
2. The petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 1) is denied.
3. A certificate of appealability and leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal are denied
4. The Clerk is directed to terminate this action.


Summaries of

McDowell v. Richardson

United States District Court, D. Arizona
Oct 31, 2011
No. CV11-0716 PHX DGC (MEA) (D. Ariz. Oct. 31, 2011)
Case details for

McDowell v. Richardson

Case Details

Full title:Theodore Cush McDowell, Petitioner, v. Shelton Richardson, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, D. Arizona

Date published: Oct 31, 2011

Citations

No. CV11-0716 PHX DGC (MEA) (D. Ariz. Oct. 31, 2011)