From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McDowell v. Cal. PIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 20, 2013
No. 2:13-cv-0170 CKD P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 20, 2013)

Opinion

No. 2:13-cv-0170 CKD P

03-20-2013

JEFFREY McDOWELL, Plaintiff, v. CAL PIA, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

By an order filed January 31, 2013, plaintiff was ordered to submit a completed application to proceed in forma pauperis or pay the appropriate filing fee within thirty days and was cautioned that failure to do so would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. (Dkt. No. 3.) The thirty day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not paid the appropriate filing fee. Plaintiff has consented to this court's jurisdiction. (Dkt. No. 4.)

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed without prejudice.

_______________

CAROLYN K. DELANEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

McDowell v. Cal. PIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 20, 2013
No. 2:13-cv-0170 CKD P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 20, 2013)
Case details for

McDowell v. Cal. PIA

Case Details

Full title:JEFFREY McDOWELL, Plaintiff, v. CAL PIA, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Mar 20, 2013

Citations

No. 2:13-cv-0170 CKD P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 20, 2013)