From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McDougald v. Timberlake

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division
Jun 21, 2010
Case No. 1:08cv744 (S.D. Ohio Jun. 21, 2010)

Opinion

Case No. 1:08cv744.

June 21, 2010


ORDER


This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation filed by the Magistrate Judge on May 27, 2010 (Doc. 47).

Proper notice has been given to the parties under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), including notice that the parties would waive further appeal if they failed to file objections to the Report and Recommendation in a timely manner. See United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981). No objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation have been filed.

Having reviewed this matter de novo pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636, this Court finds the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation to be correct.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED. Defendants' Motions for Summary Judgment (Docs. 32 and 33) are GRANTED. This matter is closed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Exhibit


Summaries of

McDougald v. Timberlake

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division
Jun 21, 2010
Case No. 1:08cv744 (S.D. Ohio Jun. 21, 2010)
Case details for

McDougald v. Timberlake

Case Details

Full title:Jerone L. McDougald, Plaintiff, v. Officer Steve E. Timberlake, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division

Date published: Jun 21, 2010

Citations

Case No. 1:08cv744 (S.D. Ohio Jun. 21, 2010)