From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McDonnell v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FOUR
Mar 31, 1998
964 S.W.2d 247 (Mo. Ct. App. 1998)

Opinion

No. 72322

ORDER FILED: March 31, 1998

Appeal from the Circuit Court, City of St. Louis, Brendan Ryan, Judge.

Charles. V. Marshall, Andrew O'Brien, The Holloran Law Firm, St. Louis, for plaintiff-appellant.

Ann E. Buckley, Thomas L. Orris, Armstrong, Teasdale, Schlafly Davis, St. Louis, for respondent-respondent.

Before ROBERT G. DOWD, Jr., P.J. and SIMON and HOFF, JJ.



ORDER

James F. McDonnell, Jr. (Appellant) appeals from the judgment entered upon a jury verdict in favor of Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (Respondent). Appellant's only point on appeal claims the trial court erred in allowing, over Appellant's objection, Respondent's counsel to discuss facts and defenses during closing argument that were not supported by the evidence.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file and the record on appeal. This allegation of error was not preserved for review because the trial judge did not expressly rule on the objection. Barnes v. Tools Machinery Builders, Inc., 715 S.W.2d 518, 523 (Mo. banc 1986). No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential or jurisprudential value. Judgment affirmed in accordance with 84.16(b).


Summaries of

McDonnell v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FOUR
Mar 31, 1998
964 S.W.2d 247 (Mo. Ct. App. 1998)
Case details for

McDonnell v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas

Case Details

Full title:JAMES F. McDONNELL, JR., Plaintiff-Appellant, vs. OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS…

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FOUR

Date published: Mar 31, 1998

Citations

964 S.W.2d 247 (Mo. Ct. App. 1998)