From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McDonald v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Nov 6, 2013
133 So. 3d 530 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

Opinion

No. 2D13–653.

2013-11-6

Kenneth McDONALD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.


Appeal pursuant to Fla. R.App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Debra K. Behnke, Judge.
Kenneth McDonald, pro se.

SLEET, Judge.

We affirm the postconviction court's order summarily denying Kenneth McDonald's postconviction motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 because McDonald's motion was without merit, untimely, and successive. We caution McDonald and others that the holding in Deras v. State, 54 So.3d 1023 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011), is limited to its facts and does not, in our view, create a manifest injustice exception to the rule 3.850 time bar.

Affirmed. NORTHCUTT and VILLANTI, JJ., Concur.


Summaries of

McDonald v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Nov 6, 2013
133 So. 3d 530 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)
Case details for

McDonald v. State

Case Details

Full title:Kenneth McDONALD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Date published: Nov 6, 2013

Citations

133 So. 3d 530 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

Citing Cases

Young v. State

Affirmed. SeeCarbajal v. State , 75 So. 3d 258 (Fla. 2011) ; State v. Waters , 436 So. 2d 66 (Fla. 1983) ;…

Young v. State

Affirmed. See Carbajal v. State, 75 So.3d 258 (Fla. 2011); State v. Waters, 436 So.2d 66 (Fla. 1983); State…