From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McDavid v. Reyes

United States District Court, Central District of California
Feb 7, 2024
8:23-cv-01981-FWS-DFM (C.D. Cal. Feb. 7, 2024)

Opinion

8:23-cv-01981-FWS-DFM

02-07-2024

Lawrence McDavid Plaintiffs/Petitioners, v. Christopher Mariano Reyes Defendants/Respondents.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL OR REMAND

The Court previously received from [x] Plaintiff(s)/Petitioner(s) [] Defendant(s)/Respondent(s):

[x] an IFP Request with no accompanying Complaint/Petition/Notice of Removal.
[] a Complaint/Petition/Notice of Removal without an accompanying IFP Request or payment of the filing fees.
[] a Complaint/Petition/Notice of Removal with a partial filing fee payment for an amount less than the required $400.

The Court sent a warning letter to S Plaintiff(s)/Petitioner(s) □ Defendant(s)/Respondent(s) advising that failure to correct this deficiency within THIRTY DAYS from the date of the warning letter would result in dismissal or remand of this case. More than THIRTY DAYS have now passed, and the deficiency has not been corrected.

Accordingly, this case is HEREBY ORDERED

[x] DISMISSED. No further filings shall be accepted under this case number.

[] REMANDED to the ___________. No further findings shall be accepted under this case number.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

McDavid v. Reyes

United States District Court, Central District of California
Feb 7, 2024
8:23-cv-01981-FWS-DFM (C.D. Cal. Feb. 7, 2024)
Case details for

McDavid v. Reyes

Case Details

Full title:Lawrence McDavid Plaintiffs/Petitioners, v. Christopher Mariano Reyes…

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Feb 7, 2024

Citations

8:23-cv-01981-FWS-DFM (C.D. Cal. Feb. 7, 2024)