From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McDaniels v. McDaniels

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Dec 21, 1965
180 So. 2d 467 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1965)

Opinion

No. G-539.

November 23, 1965. Rehearing Denied December 21, 1965.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County, Earnest E. Mason, Chancellor.

Coe Coe, Pensacola, for appellant.

Holsberry, Emmanuel, Sheppard Mitchell, Pensacola, for appellee.


Pursuant to Florida Rules of Civil Procedure 3.16, 31 F.S.A., the petition for rehearing was not timely served in the lower court and said court was therefore precluded from legally entertaining the same and the amended final decree must be reversed. Although the point was not raised by appellant, nevertheless, the record is before this court and the date of the final decree and date of filing petition for rehearing shown therein reveals the failure to comply with the above stated Rule. There is no showing that said cause falls within any of the provisions of Florida Rules of Civil Procedure 1.38, 30 F.S.A.

Lehman v. Spencer Ladd's, Inc. (Fla.S.Ct. Opinion filed November 3, 1965); Ganzer v. Ganzer (Fla. 1956) 84 So.2d 591; State ex rel. Huntley Bros., Inc., et al. v. Gooding, (Fla.App.1st, 1963) 149 So.2d 55.

Therefore, the order appealed is reversed and the Chancellor is directed to reinstate the original final decree.

WIGGINTON, Acting C.J., and STURGIS and JOHNSON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

McDaniels v. McDaniels

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Dec 21, 1965
180 So. 2d 467 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1965)
Case details for

McDaniels v. McDaniels

Case Details

Full title:GIDEON EZEKIEL McDANIELS, APPELLANT, v. DAISY ALICE McDANIELS, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Dec 21, 1965

Citations

180 So. 2d 467 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1965)

Citing Cases

Mid-State Homes, Inc. v. Ritchie

It is the established law of this state that a trial court loses jurisdiction of a case at the expiration of…

Kirby v. Speight

, 181 So.2d 725 (1966) we held that, where a motion to set aside a decree was filed too late under the rules,…