From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McDaniels v. Kirkland

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Feb 26, 2015
778 F.3d 1100 (9th Cir. 2015)

Opinion

Nos. 09–17339 11–15030.

2015-02-26

Robert McDANIELS, Petitioner–Appellant, v. Richard J. KIRKLAND, Warden; Kramer, Warden, Respondents–Appellees. Keelon T. Jenkins, Petitioner–Appellant, v. Michael S. Evans, Respondent–Appellee.

Robert McDaniels, Folsom, CA, pro se. John R. Vance, Jr., Deputy Attorney General, State of California Attorney General's Office, San Francisco, CA, for Respondents–Appellees.


Robert McDaniels, Folsom, CA, pro se. John R. Vance, Jr., Deputy Attorney General, State of California Attorney General's Office, San Francisco, CA, for Respondents–Appellees.
Albert Joel Kutchins, Berkeley, CA, for Petitioner–Appellant.

Arthur Paul Beever, Deputy Attorney General, California Department of Justice, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent–Appellee.

D.C. Nos. 4:05–cv–00904–PJH, 3:05–cv–02003–MHP.


ORDER


THOMAS, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that these cases be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a) and Circuit Rule 35–3.


Summaries of

McDaniels v. Kirkland

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Feb 26, 2015
778 F.3d 1100 (9th Cir. 2015)
Case details for

McDaniels v. Kirkland

Case Details

Full title:Robert McDANIELS, Petitioner–Appellant, v. Richard J. KIRKLAND, Warden…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Date published: Feb 26, 2015

Citations

778 F.3d 1100 (9th Cir. 2015)

Citing Cases

McDaniels v. Kirkland

We had previously held in an unrelated case, however, that a federal habeas court may consider evidence that…