From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McDaniel v. Montgomery

United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Jonesboro Division
Jul 24, 2009
3:09CV00099-WRW/JTR (E.D. Ark. Jul. 24, 2009)

Opinion

3:09CV00099-WRW/JTR.

July 24, 2009


ORDER


The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray. No objections have been filed. After careful review, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT:

1. Pursuant to the screening function mandated by 28 U.S.C. § 1915A, this case is DISMISSED, WITH PREJUDICE, for failing to state a claim upon which relief may be granted.

2. Dismissal of this action CONSTITUTES a "strike," as defined by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).

3. The Court CERTIFIES, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order and the accompanying Judgment would not be taken in good faith.


Summaries of

McDaniel v. Montgomery

United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Jonesboro Division
Jul 24, 2009
3:09CV00099-WRW/JTR (E.D. Ark. Jul. 24, 2009)
Case details for

McDaniel v. Montgomery

Case Details

Full title:CALVIN RAY McDANIEL PLAINTIFF v. THOMAS G. MONTGOMERY, Crittenden County…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Jonesboro Division

Date published: Jul 24, 2009

Citations

3:09CV00099-WRW/JTR (E.D. Ark. Jul. 24, 2009)

Citing Cases

Jackson v. Andrefont

Thus, Plaintiff's public defender is not a state actor, and Plaintiff's claims should be dismissed. See also…