From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McDaniel v. City of N.Y.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Nov 10, 2020
19-CV-3526 (JPO) (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 10, 2020)

Opinion

19-CV-3526 (JPO)

11-10-2020

CURTIS McDANIEL, Plaintiff, v. THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK, ET AL. Defendants.


ORDER :

Plaintiff, currently incarcerated at Rikers Island, brings this pro se action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. By letter dated November 9, 2020, counsel for Defendant the City of New York informed the Court that the addition of Defendant Thomas William was in error, as no such officer has ever been employed by the NYPD or was present at the time of the alleged incident. (Dkt. No. 53.) As such, Defendant Thomas William is terminated from the case, and all claims against Thomas William are dismissed.

CONCLUSION

For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiff's claims against Thomas William are dismissed, sua sponte. The Clerk of Court is also directed to terminate Thomas William as a Defendant under Fed. R. Civ. P. 21.

The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this Order to Plaintiff. SO ORDERED. Dated: November 10, 2020

New York, New York

/s/_________

J. PAUL OETKEN

United States District Judge


Summaries of

McDaniel v. City of N.Y.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Nov 10, 2020
19-CV-3526 (JPO) (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 10, 2020)
Case details for

McDaniel v. City of N.Y.

Case Details

Full title:CURTIS McDANIEL, Plaintiff, v. THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK, ET AL…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Nov 10, 2020

Citations

19-CV-3526 (JPO) (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 10, 2020)