From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McCutchen v. Macon Cnty. Sheriff's Dep't

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE COOKEVILLE DIVISION
Jan 24, 2012
No. 2:10-cv-00094 (M.D. Tenn. Jan. 24, 2012)

Opinion

No. 2:10-cv-00094

01-24-2012

JAMES MCCUTCHEN, Plaintiff, v. MACON COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, et al., Defendants.


Judge Trauger


ORDER

On October 5, 2010, the court entered an order (Docket No. 20) in which the pro se prisoner was assessed the three hundred and fifty dollar ($350) fee for the filing of a civil rights complaint.

Since the entry of this order, the plaintiff has filed a "Motion to Stop Garnishment" (Docket No. 40), asking the court to discontinue collection of the three hundred and fifty dollar assessment.

The assessment and collection of the filing fee from a prisoner in a civil rights action is mandated by statute. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(" . . . the prisoner shall be required to pay the full amount of the filing fee.")(emphasis added). As such, the court has no discretion with regard to the assessment or collection of the filing fee. Consequently, the plaintiff's Motion to Stop Garnishment has not merit and is hereby DENIED.

It is so ORDERED.

_________________________

Aleta A. Trauger

United States District Judge


Summaries of

McCutchen v. Macon Cnty. Sheriff's Dep't

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE COOKEVILLE DIVISION
Jan 24, 2012
No. 2:10-cv-00094 (M.D. Tenn. Jan. 24, 2012)
Case details for

McCutchen v. Macon Cnty. Sheriff's Dep't

Case Details

Full title:JAMES MCCUTCHEN, Plaintiff, v. MACON COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE COOKEVILLE DIVISION

Date published: Jan 24, 2012

Citations

No. 2:10-cv-00094 (M.D. Tenn. Jan. 24, 2012)