From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McCunney v. Gardner

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Feb 24, 1967
374 F.2d 110 (3d Cir. 1967)

Opinion

No. 16115.

Argued February 7, 1967.

Decided February 24, 1967.

Martin J. Resnick, Philadelphia, Pa., for appellants.

Merna B. Marshall, Asst. U.S. Atty., Philadelphia, Pa. (Drew J.T. O'Keefe, U.S. Atty., Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for appellee.

Before HASTIE, FORMAN and SMITH, Circuit Judges.


OPINION OF THE COURT


The appellant is an unsuccessful claimant of social security benefits for her children. The district court granted summary judgment denying the claimant judicial relief. The record shows that the claimant did not within the time required by law take the prescribed steps to obtain a full administrative hearing upon or review of the merits of her claim. Thereafter, the appellee's denial of a subsequent petition to reopen the matter was not an appealable order. Filice v. Celebrezze, 9th Cir., 1963, 319 F.2d 443. In the circumstances the courts cannot properly assist her.

The judgment will be affirmed.


Summaries of

McCunney v. Gardner

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Feb 24, 1967
374 F.2d 110 (3d Cir. 1967)
Case details for

McCunney v. Gardner

Case Details

Full title:Victoria McCUNNEY, Joan McCunney, Gwendolyn McCunney and Patricia McCunney…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit

Date published: Feb 24, 1967

Citations

374 F.2d 110 (3d Cir. 1967)

Citing Cases

Fyfe v. Finch

A decision to reopen, however, is clearly a discretionary decision and since the hearing examiner further…

Wright v. Weinberger

20 C.F.R. § 404.957(c)(8). In response to plaintiff's arguments, defendant maintains that the denial by the…