From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McCullough v. Graber

United States District Court, D. Arizona
Jun 3, 2011
No. CV 10-465-TUC-FRZ (JCG) (D. Ariz. Jun. 3, 2011)

Opinion

No. CV 10-465-TUC-FRZ (JCG).

June 3, 2011


ORDER


Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation issued by United States Magistrate Judge Guerin that recommends denying Petitioner's habeas petition filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. As throughly explained by Magistrate Judge Guerin, the petition must be denied as Petitioner fails to demonstrate any viable grounds entitling him to habeas relief. As Petitioner's objections do not undermine the analysis and proper conclusions reached by Magistrate Judge Guerin, Petitioner's objections are rejected and the Report and Recommendation is adopted.

The Court reviews de novo the objected-to portions of the Report and Recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b). The Court reviews for clear error the unobjected-to portions of the Report and Recommendation. Johnson v. Zema Systems Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999); see also Conley v. Crabtree, 14 F. Supp. 2d 1203, 1204 (D. Or. 1998).

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows:

(1) The Report and Recommendation (Doc. 18) is accepted and adopted.

(2) Petitioner's § 2241 habeas petition is denied; this case is dismissed with prejudice.

(3) The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment accordingly and close the file in this matter.


Summaries of

McCullough v. Graber

United States District Court, D. Arizona
Jun 3, 2011
No. CV 10-465-TUC-FRZ (JCG) (D. Ariz. Jun. 3, 2011)
Case details for

McCullough v. Graber

Case Details

Full title:Perry Adron McCullough, Petitioner, v. Conrad M. Graber, Warden, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, D. Arizona

Date published: Jun 3, 2011

Citations

No. CV 10-465-TUC-FRZ (JCG) (D. Ariz. Jun. 3, 2011)