From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McCullough v. Alexander

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE
Jun 29, 2012
No. 3:10-0649 LEAD CASE (M.D. Tenn. Jun. 29, 2012)

Opinion

No. 3:10-0649 LEAD CASE No. 3:11-0358 No. 3:11-0438

06-29-2012

TRAVIS L. McCULLOUGH, Plaintiffs, v. CHARLIE ALEXANDER, GREYHOUND LINES, INC., BEKIR OSMICEVIC, and MCR TRANS, INC. Defendants, v. CHARLIE ALEXANDER, et al, Defendants/Cross-Plaintiff v. MCR TRANS, INC. and BEKIR OSMICEVIC, Cross-Defendants.


JUDGE HAYNES

MAGISTRATE BRYANT

JURY DEMAND


MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE REPLY

Defendants MCR Trans, Inc. and Bekir Osmicevic, by and through counsel, pursuant to Local Rule 7.01(b), move this Court for leave to file a reply to Plaintiff's Response in Opposition to their Motion to Continue. For cause, Defendants state the need to address issues raised in Plaintiff's Response. A copy of Defendant's proposed Reply is attached as Exhibit A.


Summaries of

McCullough v. Alexander

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE
Jun 29, 2012
No. 3:10-0649 LEAD CASE (M.D. Tenn. Jun. 29, 2012)
Case details for

McCullough v. Alexander

Case Details

Full title:TRAVIS L. McCULLOUGH, Plaintiffs, v. CHARLIE ALEXANDER, GREYHOUND LINES…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE

Date published: Jun 29, 2012

Citations

No. 3:10-0649 LEAD CASE (M.D. Tenn. Jun. 29, 2012)