From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McCullough v. Alexander

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
May 2, 2012
No. 3:10-0649 LEAD CASE (M.D. Tenn. May. 2, 2012)

Opinion

No. 3:10-0649 LEAD CASE No. 3:11-0358 No. 3:11-0438

05-02-2012

TRAVIS L. McCULLOUGH, Plaintiff v. CHARLIE ALEXANDER, et al., Defendants BARBARA J. COOPER, et al., Plaintiffs v. CHARLIE ALEXANDER, et al. Defendants TERRI De WALD, et al., Plaintiffs v. MCR TRANSPORT, et al., Defendants


Judge Haynes/Bryant/Brown

Jury Demand


Judge Haynes

Jury Demand


Judge Haynes/Bryant

Jury Demand


ORDER

The Magistrate Judge's office was contacted by Mr. Piovarcy, who advised that the only parties who wished a settlement conference was in the McCullough case (3:10-0649). He advised that the Cooper and De Wald cases were not yet ready for a settlement conference.

It would have been easier on all concerned had this been made clear to Magistrate Judge Bryant and the undersigned when the settlement conference was requested. Nevertheless, the order setting the scheduling conference (Docket Entry 92) is modified to provide that it will apply only to the McCullough case (3:10-0649).

If the Magistrate Judge is incorrect in understanding the present situation, the parties should promptly contact his office and advise if they have a different position.

It is so ORDERED.

_________________

JOE B. BROWN

United States Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

McCullough v. Alexander

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
May 2, 2012
No. 3:10-0649 LEAD CASE (M.D. Tenn. May. 2, 2012)
Case details for

McCullough v. Alexander

Case Details

Full title:TRAVIS L. McCULLOUGH, Plaintiff v. CHARLIE ALEXANDER, et al., Defendants…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION

Date published: May 2, 2012

Citations

No. 3:10-0649 LEAD CASE (M.D. Tenn. May. 2, 2012)