From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McCreary v. Skolnik

Supreme Court of Nevada.
May 10, 2011
373 P.3d 941 (Nev. 2011)

Opinion

No. 57996.

05-10-2011

Paul McCREARY, Appellant, v. Howard SKOLNIK; Robert Bannister ; Renee Baker; Claude Willis; Martin Gregory; Ron Niman; Michael Bongard; Jerry Thompson; Hal Hollingsworth; Vince Czechorosky; Michael Koehn; and Jack Palmer, Respondents.

Paul Thomas McCreary Attorney General/Carson City


Paul Thomas McCreary

Attorney General/Carson City

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

Proper person appellant seeks to challenge a district court order denying a motion for enlargement of time and motion to exceed page limitations. As no statute or court rule authorizes an appeal from an order denying such motions, the challenged order is not substantively appealable. See NRAP 3A(b) (listing orders and judgments from which an appeal may be taken); see also Taylor Constr. Co. v. Hilton Hotels, 100 Nev. 207, 209, 678 P.2d 1152, 1153 (1984). As we lack jurisdiction to consider this appeal, we

ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.

As we conclude that we lack jurisdiction over this appeal, appellant need not file the civil proper person appeal statement and transcript request forms sent to him.


Summaries of

McCreary v. Skolnik

Supreme Court of Nevada.
May 10, 2011
373 P.3d 941 (Nev. 2011)
Case details for

McCreary v. Skolnik

Case Details

Full title:Paul McCREARY, Appellant, v. Howard SKOLNIK; Robert Bannister ; Renee…

Court:Supreme Court of Nevada.

Date published: May 10, 2011

Citations

373 P.3d 941 (Nev. 2011)