From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McCrea v. Johnson

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Aug 24, 2015
2:15-cv-1487 JAM CKD P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 24, 2015)

Opinion


TERRENCE McCREA, Plaintiff, v. B. JOHNSON, et al., Defendants. No. 2:15-cv-1487 JAM CKD P United States District Court, E.D. California. August 24, 2015

          ORDER

          CAROLYN K. DELANEY, Magistrate Judge.

         On July 30, 2015, plaintiff's complaint was dismissed with leave to file an amended complaint within thirty days. On August 7, 2015, plaintiff filed a motion seeking leave to amend, which the court construes as a request for extension of time to file an amended complaint. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

         1. Plaintiff's request for an extension of time (ECF No. 9) is granted; and

         2. Plaintiff is granted thirty days from the date of this order in which to file an amended complaint as set forth in the July 30, 2015 order. Failure to file an amended complaint within 30 days will result in the dismissal of this action.


Summaries of

McCrea v. Johnson

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Aug 24, 2015
2:15-cv-1487 JAM CKD P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 24, 2015)
Case details for

McCrea v. Johnson

Case Details

Full title:TERRENCE McCREA, Plaintiff, v. B. JOHNSON, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Aug 24, 2015

Citations

2:15-cv-1487 JAM CKD P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 24, 2015)